OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Valley Collision: OSHA inspections and violations

Ogden, Utah · General Automotive Repair · NAICS 811111

1inspections
2citation items
$2,100current penalties
Jul 29, 2025last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Valley Collision in Utah one time.

It opened on Jul 29, 2025 after a complaint, in Ogden.

In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.

The proposed penalties came to $4,200; today they stand at $2,100, 50% less.

Among repair and personal services employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $1,200 penalty. Valley Collision averages $2,100 across 1 cited inspection.

Valley Collision: OSHA citation items per year, 2025 to 2025
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Valley Collision again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348403726 OPENED JUL 29, 2025Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 14 employees at the site · Closed Sep 26, 2025

327 Kiesel Avenue, Ogden, UT 84404 · General Automotive Repair · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$2,100$1,050Aug 21, 2025Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$2,100$1,050Aug 21, 2025Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)

(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.

Other general automotive repair employers in Utah

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.