OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Valtex, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Fort Myers, Florida · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

6inspections
3citation items
$3,715current penalties
Nov 27, 2023last inspection

Since 2014, OSHA inspectors have visited Valtex, LLC in Florida 6 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Nov 27, 2023 after a complaint, in Seminole.

In all, OSHA issued 3 citation items: 3 serious.

The proposed penalties came to $6,192; today they stand at $3,715, 40% less.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,078 penalty. Valtex, LLC averages $1,680 across 1 cited inspection.

Valtex, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2014 to 2023
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Valtex, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347128357 OPENED NOV 27, 2023Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Dec 14, 2023

Valor Preserve 9575 Seminole Blvd., Seminole, FL 33772 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 346546187 OPENED MAR 3, 2023Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Apr 28, 2023

First Street Apartments & Garage 3466 First Street, Fort Myers, FL 33901 · New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 344325782 OPENED SEP 20, 2019Closed

Unprogrammed other · Complete · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Oct 22, 2019

2630 Ortiz Ave, Fort Myers, FL 33905 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 340692334 OPENED JUN 4, 2015Closed

Unprogrammed other · Partial · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Oct 9, 2015

Colonial Commons 4590 Winkler Ave, Fort Myers, FL 33966 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$2,800$1,680Sep 15, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(5) · Fall protection systems
Serious$0$0Sep 15, 2015Final

Inspection 340093830 OPENED NOV 19, 2014Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 11 employees at the site · Closed Jan 8, 2015

15031 Mcgregor Blvd, Fort Myers, FL 33908 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$3,392$2,035Nov 26, 2014Final

Inspection 339689705 OPENED APR 18, 2014Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 22 employees at the site · Closed Oct 17, 2014

8120 Acacia St., Naples, FL 34114 · Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1)

(b)(1) Unprotected sides and edges. Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(k)(5)

(5) The fall protection plan shall document the reasons why the use of conventional fall protection systems (guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, or safety nets systems) are infeasible or why their use would create a greater hazard.

Other framing contractors employers in Florida

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.