Daytona Beach, Florida · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA has inspected Vquest Construction Services, Inc. 3 times in Florida since 2011.
The latest one began on Feb 22, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Jacksonville.
Those inspections ended with 4 citation items: 3 serious and 1 repeat.
Penalties were first proposed at $16,180 and now stand at $11,770, 27% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and Vquest Construction Services, Inc. averages $3,880 (1 cited inspection).
Florida · latest 90 days of OSHA records
338employers cited
77 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Florida: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Florida
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Vquest Construction Services, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company4847 Moncrief Road, Jacksonville, FL 32209 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $3,880 | $3,880 | Mar 8, 2018 | Final |
2315 Atlantic Avenue, Daytona Beach, FL 32118 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $7,200 | $4,320 | Jan 17, 2012 | Closed |
2315 Atlantic Avenue, Daytona Beach, FL 32118 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,550 | $1,785 | Nov 25, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $2,550 | $1,785 | Nov 25, 2011 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)
(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Florida the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.