OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Walker Magnetics: OSHA inspections and violations

Windsor, Connecticut · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · NAICS 332999

1inspections
1citation items
$5,735current penalties
Dec 23, 2019last inspection

Walker Magnetics has one OSHA inspection on record in Connecticut.

OSHA opened it on Dec 23, 2019 on a referral, in Windsor.

From that inspection OSHA issued 1 citation item: 1 serious.

OSHA proposed $5,735 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Walker Magnetics averages $5,735 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.

Walker Magnetics: OSHA citation items per year, 2019 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Walker Magnetics again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344529110 OPENED DEC 23, 2019Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 26 employees at the site · Closed Feb 12, 2020

600 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Dec 10, 2019: Employee using shear suffers partial amputation of fingertip

At 7:20 a.m. on December 10, 2019, an employee was working as an assembler for a firm that designed and manufactured magnets for scrap metal processing operations. He was working in the firm's fabrication area. He was cutting small pieces of fiberglass insulation board on a Lodge & Shipley model 0408 straight shear. The employee was pushing the material toward the blade, when his finger went under the guard for one of the hold-downs. The shear cycled, and his finger was caught under the hold-down. When he tried to pull his hand free, the tip of his finger was partially amputated. He was treated without hospitalization. The barrier guard on the shear allowed access to both the hold-downs and the point of operation. The guard provided on the first hold-down was raised high enough to allow fingers to pass underneath and into the path of the hold-down. Sight openings provided in the guard were large enough to reach through to the shear point. In at least one area, vertical members in the guard were bent, creating a space that could be reached through to the shear point.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$5,735$5,735Jan 16, 2020Final

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.

Dec 10, 2019, Windsor: Amputation · amputations · fingertip(s)

An employee was cutting metal on a shear. As he pushed material into the shear, the machine started. His finger was crushed and the tip was amputated.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

Other all other miscellaneous fabricated metal product manufacturing employers in Connecticut

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.