Inspection 344287685 OPENED SEP 5, 2019Closed
Lot#442 Timber Green Drive, Urbana, MD 21704 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Since 2018, OSHA inspectors have visited Warrior Express Construction, LLC in Maryland 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Sep 5, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Urbana.
In all, OSHA issued 4 citation items: 3 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $2,100; today they stand at $1,040, 50% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.502 (fall protection systems), 2 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Warrior Express Construction, LLC averages $1,040 across 1 cited inspection.
Maryland · latest 90 days of OSHA records
197employers cited
39 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Maryland: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Maryland
- Town of Bel AirBel Air · cited Oct 9, 2026
- Board of Washington County CommissionersHagerstown · cited Oct 5, 2026
- Atlas Foundations of Washington, LLCCapitol Heights · cited Oct 5, 2026
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Warrior Express Construction, LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this companyInspection history
Inspection 342877669 OPENED JAN 11, 2018Closed
Lot# 26 Willow Branch Way, Severn, MD 21144 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(10)(i) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $1,050 | $567 | Mar 15, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 15, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 05-104(A) |
Serious | $1,050 | $473 | Mar 15, 2018 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 15, 2018 | Final |
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(10)(i)
(10) (i) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(10)(ii) of this section, when vertical lifelines are used, each employee shall be attached to a separate lifeline.
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17)
(17) The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.
29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1)
(b) Certification of training. (1) The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.
Other roofing contractors employers in Maryland
- Ilc Contracting LLC Frederick · 28 citations · $43,325
- Gerardo Sabillon Power Brunswick · 72 citations · $32,111
- JYL Builders LLC Ocean City · 21 citations · $8,737
- WF Construction LLC Baltimore · 13 citations · $2,980
- Victory Construction, LLC Rosedale · 12 citations · $6,062
- Tobar Construction, Inc. Baltimore · 26 citations · $10,394
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Maryland the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.