Since 2012, OSHA inspectors have visited Watertight Solutions in Texas 3 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Mar 6, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Fort Worth.
In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 repeat.
The proposed penalties came to $14,981; today they stand at $9,549, 36% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 3 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Watertight Solutions averages $2,029 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Watertight Solutions again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company5140 Se Loop 820, Fort Worth, TX 76140 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,932 | $1,159 | Mar 6, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi) · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction |
Serious | $1,449 | $869 | Mar 6, 2019 | Final |
306 Palo Pinto Street, Weatherford, TX 76085 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Repeat | $5,600 | $3,920 | Apr 30, 2013 | Final |
101 Hialeah Park Drive, Saginaw, TX 76179 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv) · Job-site wiring |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,200 | Jul 11, 2012 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,680 | Jul 11, 2012 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) · Ladders in construction |
Serious | $1,200 | $720 | Jul 11, 2012 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)
(1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv)
(iv) Strain relief. Flexible cords shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)
(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.