OSHA inspectors have visited Weiser Engineering in Colorado one time.
It opened on Mar 15, 2016 after a complaint, in Arvada.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $1,785; today they stand at $1,071, 40% less.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Weiser Engineering averages $1,071 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Weiser Engineering again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company5905 Lamar Street, Arvada, CO 80003 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $1,785 | $1,071 | May 12, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(ii) · Hexavalent chromium |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | May 12, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(ii)
(l) Communication of chromium (VI) hazards to employees—(1) Hazard communication—general—(i) Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors and employers shall comply with all requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (§ 1910.1200) for chromium (VI).
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)
(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.