OSHA has inspected William Durham once in New York.
The inspection began on Jul 18, 2018 as part of a related case, in Owego.
That inspection ended with 1 citation item: 1 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $2,772 and still stand at $2,772.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and William Durham averages $2,772 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites William Durham again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company200 - 204 Front Street, Owego, NY 13827 · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,772 | $2,772 | Jul 27, 2018 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3)
(3) Hoist areas. Each employee in a hoist area shall be protected from falling 6 feet (1.8 m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems. If guardrail systems, [or chain, gate, or guardrail] or portions thereof, are removed to facilitate the hoisting operation (e.g., during landing of materials), and an employee must lean through the access opening or out over the edge of the access opening (to receive or guide equipment and materials, for example), that employee shall be protected from fall hazards by a personal fall arrest system.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.