OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Wingate at Reading: OSHA inspections and violations

Reading, Massachusetts · Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) · NAICS 623110

2inspections
9citation items
$10,588current penalties
Mar 8, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Wingate at Reading 2 times in Massachusetts since 2000.

The latest one began on Mar 8, 2016 after a complaint, in Reading.

Those inspections ended with 9 citation items: 9 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $21,190 and now stand at $10,588, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.

Bloodborne pathogens comes up most often in these citations: 8 items under 1910.1030.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for health care employers since 2015 is $1,050, and Wingate at Reading averages $8,900 (1 cited inspection).

Wingate at Reading also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Wingate at Reading: OSHA citation items per year, 2000 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Massachusetts · latest 90 days of OSHA records

242employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Massachusetts: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Massachusetts

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Wingate at Reading and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341308286 OPENED MAR 8, 2016Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 114 employees at the site · Closed Nov 10, 2016

1364 Main Street, Reading, MA 01867 · Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iii) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$7,126$3,560Aug 24, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$0$0Aug 24, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$0$0Aug 24, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1d
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$0$0Aug 24, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(b) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$10,689$5,340Aug 25, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(n) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$0$0Aug 25, 2016Final

Inspection 300551322 OPENED AUG 3, 2000Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 178 employees at the site · Closed Nov 14, 2000

1364 Main Street, Reading, MA 01867 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.151(c) · First aid and eyewash
Serious$1,500$750Sep 12, 2000Closed
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(ii) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$1,875$938Sep 12, 2000Closed
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(iid) · Bloodborne pathogens
Serious$0$0Sep 12, 2000Closed

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2018, the Reading site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 94 workers: 3.8 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 5.5 for its industry. Those cases cost 1 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Wingate at Reading
Reading · 2018
94 313.85.5

Included with any plan: 2 more yearly logs from these sites, back to 2016, with each site's average rate over its latest three years. Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See plans

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1030 · Bloodborne pathogens

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iii)

(iii) Each employer shall ensure that a copy of the Exposure Control Plan is accessible to employees in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.20(e).

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)

(iv) The Exposure Control Plan shall be reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure. The review and update of such plans shall also:

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v)

(v) An employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan shall solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and shall document the solicitation in the Exposure Control Plan.

29 CFR 1910.151 · First aid and eyewash

Other nursing care facilities (skilled nursing facilities) employers in Massachusetts

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Massachusetts the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.