La Crescent, Minnesota · Site Preparation Contractors · NAICS 238910
Zenke Inc has 4 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2002.
OSHA's last visit started on Apr 8, 2021 as a planned inspection, in La Crescent.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 10 citation items: 10 serious.
OSHA proposed $4,575 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $2,832, down 38%.
Most often, OSHA cited 1926.651, excavations (3 items).
For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Zenke Inc averages $551 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
381employers cited
2 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Zenke Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company916 Cedar Drive, La Crescent, MN 55947 · Site Preparation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2) · Excavations |
Serious | $375 | $262 | Apr 21, 2021 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1) · Trench protection |
Serious | $825 | $578 | Apr 21, 2021 | Final |
534 S 3rd Street, La Crescent, MN 55947 · Site Preparation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $375 | $262 | Sep 20, 2018 | Final |
Oak Street N & Second Street N, La Crescent, MN 55947 · Site Preparation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $225 | $124 | Jul 6, 2012 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2) · Excavations |
Serious | $375 | $206 | Jul 6, 2012 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2) · Excavations |
Serious | $375 | $375 | Jul 6, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 4 29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1) · Trench protection |
Serious | $525 | $525 | Jul 6, 2012 | Closed |
North Ridge Rd, La Crescent, MN 55947 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) · Construction safety training |
Serious | $1,000 | $350 | Sep 26, 2002 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 26, 2002 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.850(a) · Preparatory operations |
Serious | $500 | $150 | Sep 26, 2002 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2)
(2) The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1)
(b)(1) Unprotected sides and edges. Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.