OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

4Front Engineered Solutions: OSHA inspections and violations

Muskego, Wisconsin · Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing · NAICS 332311

2inspections
5citation items
$5,414current penalties
Dec 18, 2024last inspection

4Front Engineered Solutions has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Wisconsin, the first in 2011.

OSHA's last visit started on Dec 18, 2024 after a complaint, in Kenosha.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $7,735 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $5,414, down 30%.

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. 4Front Engineered Solutions averages $0 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

4Front Engineered Solutions also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

4Front Engineered Solutions: OSHA citation items per year, 2011 to 2024
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites 4Front Engineered Solutions again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347942591 OPENED DEC 18, 2024Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 110 employees at the site · Closed Jun 25, 2025

13850 101st Street, Kenosha, WI 53142 · All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i) · Hexavalent chromium
Other-than-serious$0$0Apr 10, 2025Final

Inspection 330978768 OPENED AUG 23, 2011Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 75 employees at the site · Closed Dec 27, 2011

W183 S8253 Racine Ave., Muskego, WI 53150 · Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$2,380$1,666Nov 30, 2011Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
Serious$2,975$2,082Nov 30, 2011Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5) · Hazard communication
Serious$2,380$1,666Nov 30, 2011Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii) · Electrical wiring methods
Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 30, 2011Final

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2025, the Muskego site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 163 workers: 2.1 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 3.6 for its industry. Those cases cost 1 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
4Front Engineered Solutions- Muskego
Muskego · 2025
163 312.13.6
4Front Engineered Solutions - Kenosha
Kenosha · 2025
133 806.43.6
4Front Engineer Solutions- Muskego
Muskego · 2021
152 624.43.6

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1026 · Hexavalent chromium

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i)

(2) Scheduled monitoring option. (i) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where an employer does representative sampling instead of sampling all employees in order to meet this requirement, the employer shall sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)

(f) Any organic peroxide which, in laboratory testing, neither detonates in the cavitated state nor deflagrates at all and shows only a low or no effect when heated under confinement as well as low or no explosive power shall be defined as organic peroxide TYPE F;

29 CFR 1910.147 · Lockout/tagout

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)

(ii) Lockout devices and tagout devices shall be singularly identified; shall be the only devices(s) used for controlling energy; shall not be used for other purposes; and shall meet the following requirements:

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.305 · Electrical wiring methods

Other prefabricated metal building and component manufacturing employers in Wisconsin

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.