OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Abtex, LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Dresden, New York · Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing · NAICS 339994

2inspections
6citation items
$6,470current penalties
Dec 28, 2023last inspection

Since 1988, OSHA inspectors have visited Abtex, LLC in New York 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Dec 28, 2023 after a complaint, in Dresden.

In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 5 serious and 1 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $8,486; today they stand at $6,470, 24% less.

The rule cited most here is 1910.1200 (hazard communication), 3 times.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Abtex, LLC averages $6,050 across 1 cited inspection.

Abtex, LLC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Abtex, LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 1988 to 2023
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Abtex, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347185514 OPENED DEC 28, 2023Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 33 employees at the site · Closed May 16, 2024

89 Main Street, Dresden, NY 14441 · Broom, Brush, and Mop Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2) · Working near live electrical parts
Serious$6,453$4,840Mar 21, 2024Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1904.4(a) · Recording criteria
Other-than-serious$1,613$1,210Mar 21, 2024Final

Inspection 102646841 OPENED MAR 8, 1988Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 7 employees at the site · Closed Jul 14, 1988

89 Main St., Dresden, NY 14441 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
Serious$240$240May 20, 1988Closed
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$180$180May 20, 1988Closed
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.1200(h) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0May 20, 1988Closed
Citation 1, item 2c
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(4)(ii) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0May 20, 1988Closed

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2025, the Dresden site logged 0 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 30 workers: 0.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.5 for its industry.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Abtex LLC.
Dresden · 2025
30 000.02.5
Abtex LLC
Dresden · 2024
33 113.12.5

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1904.4 · Recording criteria

29 CFR 1904.4(a)

(a) Basic requirement. Each employer required by this part to keep records of fatalities, injuries, and illnesses must record each fatality, injury and illness that:

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(4)(ii)

(ii) The label may be transmitted with the initial shipment itself, or with the safety data sheet that is to be provided prior to or at the time of the first shipment; and,

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.333 · Working near live electrical parts

Other broom, brush, and mop manufacturing employers in New York

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.