OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Alex Rivera: OSHA inspections and violations

Daphne, Alabama · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

2inspections
5citation items
$22,123current penalties
Apr 24, 2024last inspection

Since 2024, OSHA inspectors have visited Alex Rivera in Alabama 2 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Apr 24, 2024 to follow up on an earlier case, in Daphne.

In all, OSHA issued 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 repeat.

The penalties, $22,123 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. Alex Rivera averages $11,062 across 2 cited inspections.

Alex Rivera: OSHA citation items per year, 2024 to 2024
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Alex Rivera again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347435430 OPENED APR 24, 2024Closed

Follow-up · Partial · Safety · 8 employees at the site · Closed Oct 6, 2026

11495 Elemis Drive Lot 201 Reserve At Daphne, Daphne, AL 36526 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.304(d) · Woodworking tools
 Serious$2,765$2,765May 1, 2024Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Repeat$5,531$5,531May 1, 2024Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Repeat$8,297$8,297May 1, 2024Final

Inspection 347341984 OPENED MAR 13, 2024Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Oct 5, 2026

26815 Montelucia Way Lot 89 Reserve At Daphne, Daphne, AL 36526 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction
 Serious$2,765$2,765Mar 15, 2024Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$2,765$2,765Mar 15, 2024Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.102 · Eye and face protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)

(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

29 CFR 1926.304 · Woodworking tools

29 CFR 1926.304(d)

(d) Guarding. All portable, power-driven circular saws shall be equipped with guards above and below the base plate or shoe. The upper guard shall cover the saw to the depth of the teeth, except for the minimum arc required to permit the base to be tilted for bevel cuts. The lower guard shall cover the saw to the depth of the teeth, except for the minimum arc required to allow proper retraction and contact with the work. When the tool is withdrawn from the work, the lower guard shall automatically and instantly return to the covering position.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other framing contractors employers in Alabama

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.