Inspection 343728242 OPENED JAN 22, 2019Closed
One Howmet Drive, Hampton, VA 23661 · Nonferrous Metal Foundries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
OSHA has inspected Arconic, Inc. 3 times in Virginia since 2017.
The latest one began on Jan 22, 2019 after a complaint, in Hampton.
Those inspections ended with 5 citation items: 5 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $8,190 and now stand at $5,733, 30% lower after settlements or reviews.
Exit routes comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.37.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Arconic, Inc. averages $5,733 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Arconic, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this companyOne Howmet Drive, Hampton, VA 23661 · Nonferrous Metal Foundries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
One Howmet Dr., Hampton, VA 23661 · Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting Foundries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
One Howmet Dr., Hampton, VA 23661 · Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting Foundries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4) · Exit routes |
Serious | $4,095 | $2,866 | Mar 21, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5) · Exit routes |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 21, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $4,095 | $2,866 | Mar 21, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4) · Grinders and abrasive wheels |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 21, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9) · Grinders and abrasive wheels |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 21, 2017 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4)
(4) Work rests. On offhand grinding machines, work rests shall be used to support the work. They shall be of rigid construction and designed to be adjustable to compensate for wheel wear. Work rests shall be kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage. The work rest shall be securely clamped after each adjustment. The adjustment shall not be made with the wheel in motion.
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9)
(9) Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b) (3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.