OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Armando Mora: OSHA inspections and violations

Manchester, New Hampshire · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
2citation items
$3,990current penalties
Sep 5, 2018last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Armando Mora in New Hampshire one time.

It opened on Sep 5, 2018 after a complaint, in Manchester.

In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.

The proposed penalties came to $6,652; today they stand at $3,990, 40% less.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. Armando Mora averages $3,990 across 1 cited inspection.

Armando Mora: OSHA citation items per year, 2018 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Armando Mora again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343443040 OPENED SEP 5, 2018Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Nov 28, 2022

2159 Elm Street, Manchester, NH 03101 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$3,880$2,328Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12) · Ladders in construction
Serious$2,772$1,662Oct 18, 2018Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12)

(12) Ladders shall have nonconductive siderails if they are used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment, except as provided in § 1926.955(b) and (c) of this part.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

Other roofing contractors employers in New Hampshire

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.