Since 2013, OSHA inspectors have visited Armando Ruiz in Texas 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Apr 16, 2015 as a planned inspection, in Fort Worth.
In all, OSHA issued 3 citation items: 3 serious.
The proposed penalties came to $5,020; today they stand at $4,220, 16% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,079 penalty. Armando Ruiz averages $3,020 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Armando Ruiz again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company8500 Tiera Ct., Fort Worth, TX 76126 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Serious | $1,020 | $1,020 | Apr 29, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Apr 29, 2015 | Final |
2403 Bagby, Houston, TX 77006 · Other Building Finishing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,200 | Feb 28, 2013 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)
(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.