OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Arthurmade Plastics, Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Commerce, California · Industrial Mold Manufacturing · NAICS 333511

1inspections
7citation items
$14,435current penalties
Jun 29, 2022last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Arthurmade Plastics, Inc in California one time.

It opened on Jun 29, 2022 after a complaint, in Commerce.

In all, OSHA issued 7 citation items: 1 serious and 6 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $53,385; today they stand at $14,435, 73% less.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Arthurmade Plastics, Inc averages $14,435 across 1 cited inspection.

Arthurmade Plastics, Inc also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Arthurmade Plastics, Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2022 to 2022
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

California · latest 90 days of OSHA records

1,111employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in California: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in California

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Arthurmade Plastics, Inc and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346057441 OPENED JUN 29, 2022Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 103 employees at the site · Closed Jun 12, 2023

2131 Garfield Avenue, Commerce, CA 90040 · Industrial Mold Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Jun 29, 2021: Employee burns and crushes hand when caught in hot stamp mac

At 1:30 p.m. on June 29, 2021, an employee was working as an electrician/maintenance technician for plastic container manufacturer. Raw resin is injected or blow molded after which time the containers are run through an automated system that performs finishing operations including hot stamping labels. The employee was adjusting the hot stamp plate on a MAS Automated Pail System machine #9 (Serial #11187). Coworker #1, the automation/maintenance manager, is the employee's supervisor. The employee reported being instructed to change the machine from 4.5 gallon buckets to 5.5 gallon buckets. The employee needed to adjust the labeling part of the hot stamp. While the machine was operating he opened the interlocked front door. The employee needed to adjust the laser for the bucket label which required adjusting the bucket. He reached into the machine and was manually turning the bucket when the hot stamp activated and caught his hand. The employee said lockout tagout was not required on this particular machine. Coworker #2, the production floor lead, reported that the hot stamp only works when activated by a bucket and the employee asked for help putting the buckets in the machine to observe it running. Coworker #2 said that he saw the employee put a piece of metal in or over the sensor so he could work with the door open and the machine running. The employee was manually turning the bucket to adjust the labeling part when the machine activated and the laser stamped a label on the bucket. Coworker #1 said they looked for a piece of metal to defeat the interlock sensor but could not find it. The employee denied attempting to defeat the interlock. The employee sustained crush injuries and third degree burns to his left hand. The employee was taken to the hospital, where his wound was cleaned and he was sent home. On July 1, 2021, the employee went back to the hospital, where he was admitted and spent approximately 15 days in the hospital to treat his injury.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 342(A)
Other-than-serious$5,000$5,000Oct 31, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 2 Other-than-serious$500$500Oct 31, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 3203(A)
Other-than-serious$1,250$1,250Oct 31, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 3314(G)(2)(A)
Other-than-serious$935$0Oct 31, 2022Final
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 3314(J)
Other-than-serious$700$0Oct 31, 2022Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 3314(C)
Other-than-serious$22,500$935Oct 31, 2022Final
Citation 3, item 1
29 CFR 3314(L)
Serious$22,500$6,750Oct 31, 2022Final

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2018, the Commerce site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 92 workers: 3.3 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.6 for its industry.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
API Kirk Containers
Commerce · 2018
92 303.32.6

Included with any plan: 1 more yearly log from these sites, back to 2017, with each site's average rate over its latest three years. Already a subscriber? Sign in.

See plans

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 4300.29

Other industrial mold manufacturing employers in California

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in California the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.