Bend Pak, Inc. has 7 OSHA inspections on record in California, the first in 1991.
OSHA's last visit started on Nov 13, 2015 after an accident, in Santa Paula.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 14 citation items: 14 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $24,870 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $5,770, down 77%.
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Bend Pak, Inc. averages $1,870 over 1 cited inspection in that time.
Inspection 300831765 OPENED OCT 4, 2005Closed
Accident · Partial · Safety · 125 employees at the site · Closed Nov 13, 2008
1645 Lemonwood Dr., Santa Paula, CA 93060 · Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Sep 2, 2005: Employee arm is crushed by hydraulic lift
On September 2, 2005 Employee #1, a welding supervisor, was disconnecting a hydr aulic pump that was being used to operate hydraulics for equipment and hydraulic actuated products. The pump was attached to a SR 12 E Ramp, a car ramp produced by the company. Hydraulic fluid is pumped from the hydraulic pump to the ramp v ia a hose. As hydraulic fluid is pumped into the system, the track of the lift i s elevated. The lifting action is similar to a scissor lift. As the platform is elevated, the pawl of the pawl-rack system rides along the rack. Once the approp riate height is achieved the hydraulic system is depressurized slightly so the l ift lowers to allow the pawl rest on the next lower tooth on the rack; effective ly dogging the lift at the desired height. The lift is lowered by utilizing a pn eumatic system in conjunction with the hydraulic system. The pneumatics release and hold the pawl off the rack. With the pawl disengaged the lift is supported o nly by the hydraulic pressure supplied by the pump. The hydraulic fluid is relea sed and the lift lowers. Employee #1 was holding the pawl off the rack with his right arm and bleeding the hydraulic fluid from the lift with left hand. The lin kages of the lift closed as the pressure is bled out. The linkages closed on Emp loyee #1's right arm, crushing it. Employee #1 was not aware of the secondary pn eumatic system to hold the pawl and he was working alone. Employee #1 was hospit alized and treated for his injuries. This was not Employee #1's regular assigned task and he was not trained to operate the equipment.
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 342 A |
Other-than-serious | $5,000 | $900 | Mar 1, 2006 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 3203 A07 |
Other-than-serious | $18,000 | $3,000 | Mar 1, 2006 | Final |
Incident on Jan 21, 2000: Employee injured when foot crushed by bundle of steel chains
Employee #1's foot was crushed while he was testing an auto lift cylinder with 3 000 pounds of weight. The lift cylinder test failed and the steel chains used as testing weight fell onto Employee #1's foot, causing a fracture and his hospita lization.
No citations from this inspection.
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.