Bme Tool Inc has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Minnesota, the first in 2014.
OSHA's last visit started on Sep 1, 2026 as a planned inspection, in Lonsdale.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 11 citation items: 6 serious and 5 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $2,700 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $1,658, down 39%.
Most often, OSHA cited 5206.700, (3 items).
For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Bme Tool Inc averages $266 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
Want to know if OSHA cites Bme Tool Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company101 Delaware St Se, Lonsdale, MN 55046 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.178(l) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks |
Other-than-serious | $150 | $90 | Sep 17, 2026 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 | Other-than-serious | $150 | $90 | Sep 17, 2026 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 | Other-than-serious | $150 | $90 | Sep 17, 2026 | Final |
101 Delaware St Se, Lonsdale, MN 55046 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $375 | $262 | Jan 3, 2018 | Final |
101 Delaware St Se, Lonsdale, MN 55046 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $250 | $150 | Sep 25, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $375 | $225 | Sep 25, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools |
Serious | $375 | $225 | Sep 25, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 4 | Serious | $375 | $225 | Sep 25, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 5 | Serious | $375 | $225 | Sep 25, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $125 | $75 | Sep 25, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 2 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 25, 2014 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv)
(iv) The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.242(b)
(b) Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.