C W Wright Construction Co LLC: OSHA inspections and violations
Richmond, Virginia · Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction · NAICS 237130
35inspections
41citation items
$137,295current penalties
Feb 8, 2022last inspection
OSHA has inspected C W Wright Construction Co LLC 35 times in Virginia since 1983.
The latest one began on Feb 8, 2022 on a referral, in Ruther Glen.
Those inspections ended with 41 citation items: 23 serious and 18 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $272,045 and now stand at $137,295, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.
Hazard communication comes up most often in these citations: 6 items under 1926.59.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,080, and C W Wright Construction Co LLC averages $9,800 (1 cited inspection).
7 inspections on this page followed a fatal incident.
C W Wright Construction Co LLC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Citation items per year, by inspection date.
Virginia · latest 90 days of OSHA records
253employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Virginia: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch C W Wright Construction Co LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Incident on Jan 24, 2022: Employee is pinned by equipment, receives fractures to leg a
At 10:30 a.m. on January 24, 2022, an employee walked beside an EZ Hauler 55 MLP. While moving forward, the EZ Hauler struck a stump and tipped over onto the employee and pinning them. The employee was hospitalized to treat fractures to the ribs and right leg.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 342305893 OPENED MAY 4, 2017Closed
Planned · Partial · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed May 4, 2017
Planned · Partial · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Dec 2, 2015
Intersection Of Loudoun County Parkway And Washington Old Dominion Trail, Ashburn, VA 20147 · Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
Incident on Sep 18, 2012 (fatal): Employee dies in electrical accident
Employee #1 was working from an elevated bucket pulling ground wire for new util ity pole. As Employee #1 pulled up the wire hand over hand, the wire contacted a n energized line above him. Employee #1 was pronounced dead at the scene of the accident.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 316455450 OPENED MAR 22, 2012Closed
Planned · Partial · Safety · 9 employees at the site · Closed Apr 16, 2012
Incident on Jun 19, 2010 (fatal): Employee is killed in fall from pole tower
On June 19, 2010, an employee was painting while located on a transmission power pole at an elevation of about 55-ft to 65-ft. The employee's personal fall arre st system failed, and the employee fell to the ground and was killed.
No citations from this inspection.
Inspection 313452948 OPENED MAY 26, 2009Closed
Planned · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Aug 18, 2009
Incident on Dec 1, 2008 (fatal): Employee is electrocuted while installing utility pole
Employee #1 was installing a new 40 utility pole to replace an older utility pol e. He was using a boom truck with a claw attached to the end of the boom to set the pole into place. The pole was elevated with a winch that was attached to the boom and the pole was to be placed inside the claw when it reached a suitable h eight. After elevating the pole, it rested on the outside of the claw and had to be maneuvered to be placed inside the claw. Employee #1 placed his unprotected hands on the pole to maneuver it, causing the top of the pole to come into conta ct with the hose shielding the overhead 19,900 Volt power line. As a result of t he contact, Employee #1 was electrocuted.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR VAC004001
Other-than-serious
$7,000
$3,000
May 18, 2009
Final
Inspection 311443519 OPENED SEP 19, 2007Closed
Planned · Complete · Safety · 5 employees at the site · Closed Sep 21, 2007
Incident on Jan 27, 2005 (fatal): Electric shock - direct contact with overhead line
A power line worker was working from an aerial lift, transferring an overhead po wer line from one utility pole to another. He was removing rubber insulating lin e hose from the power line. As he was removing the line hose for the second phas e conductor, his back contacted the unprotected conductor. He was electrocuted. (He also fell from the aerial lift bucket to the ground.)
Incident on Jun 4, 2002 (fatal): Fall - aerial lift failure
Two power line workers (Employees #1 and #2) were in a 45.7-meter Condor aerial lift transferring insulated conductors and replacing horizontal support arms on 38.1-meter-tall steel towers supporting a 230-kilovolt overhead power line along a 37-kilometer right-of-way. Another crew, working from a similar aerial lift, was assisting the employees. The employees were using full body harnesses connec ted by lanyards to the aerial lift platform. Both platforms were about 24 meters above the ground so that the employees could work on the insulator and lower su pport arm, which were located on the west side of a tower. As employees #1 and # 2 started to elevate and extend their platform, a pop was heard, originating fro m where the upper jib was attached to the vertical frame of the main boom assemb ly. The upper jib boom and the platform, with the two employees still tied off, fell to the ground. The two employees were taken to a hospital, where employee # 1 was pronounced dead on arrival. Employee #2 was airlifted to a shock-trauma ce nter, where he died of his injuries 6 days after the accident.
Citation and rule
Type
Proposed
Current
Issued
Status
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 510001 A
Unclassified
$70,000
$35,000
Dec 2, 2002
Final
Inspection 304539604 OPENED AUG 6, 2001Closed
Accident · Complete · Safety · 24 employees at the site · Closed Dec 3, 2002
Incident on Aug 2, 2001 (fatal): Electric shock - induced current in overhead line
Three employees were working from an aerial lift on a 21-meter-tall steel electr ic transmission tower. The employees were unable to extend the aerial lift bucke t to the area where a grounding jumper was to be disconnected. To access the jum per, one of the employees decided to climb onto the tower. He transferred onto a crossmember on the deenergized side of the tower. His left foot slipped from th e crossmember. Although he was tied off to the structure, his left leg contacted a wind brace while his right forearm touched one of the deenergized overhead po wer line conductors. This conductor was energized by induced current, and the em ployee was electrocuted.
Incident on Jul 10, 1989 (fatal): Electric shock - direct contact with energized conductor
A POWER LINE WORKER WAS WORKING ON A 240/120-VOLT POWER LINE ON A HOT HUMID DAY. HE HAD BEEN USING RUBBER INSULATING GLOVES BUT, DURING A BREAK, REMOVED THEM. W HEN HE RESUMED WORKING, HE DID NOT PUT HIS RUBBER GLOVES BACK ON. THE EMPLOYEE G RABBED THE 120-VOLT LINE CONDUCTOR AND THE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR SIMULTANEOUSLY AND WAS ELECTROCUTED.
Incident on Sep 10, 1986: Crane operator injured when crane tilted into load
AT APPROXIMATELY 9 AM ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1986, EMPLOYEE #1 WAS USING A MODEL PM 20 1 "POLE-MASTER" AS A TRUCK CRANE, ATTEMPTING TO UNLOAD A 5 FOOT CLAM BUCKET FROM A TRUCK PARKED BESIDE IT. THE CLAM BUCKET WEIGHED APPROXIMATELY 3515 LBS., WELL WITHIN THE CRANE'S CAPACITY. THE CRANE WAS RATED AT 9500 POUNDS. THE CRANE WAS SET UP ON SOFT, UNSTABLE GROUND (THERE WAS SOME STANDING WATER AT THE SITE). BOT H OF THE CRANE'S OUTRIGGERS WERE DOWN, BUT THERE WAS NO PAD UNDER THE LEFT OUTRI GGER AND ONLY A 19 INCH LONG 4 BY 4 UNDER THE RIGHT OUTRIGGER. THE CLAMBUCKET WA S ATTACHED TO THE LOADLINE. EMPLOYEE #1 TOLD THE TRUCK DRIVER TO PULL HIS TRUCK OUT FROM UNDER THE BUCKET AS SOON AS IT WAS LIFTED OFF THE TRUCK BED. EMPLOYEE # 1 WAS OPERATING THE CRANE CONTROLS FROM A POSITION NEXT TO THE LOADED TRUCK. WHE N THE TRUCK MOVED FORWARD ABOUT TEN OR TWELVE FEET THE RIGHT OUTRIGGER SANK INTO THE SOFT GROUND. THE CRANE TILTED TOWARD THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK, PINNING EMPLOYE E #1 BETWEEN THE 2 VEHICLES. HE SUFFERED A BROKEN JAW, CRUSHED RIGHT HAND, 4 OR 5 BROKEN RIBS ON HIS RIGHT SIDE AND COLLAPSED LUNGS. THE ACCIDENT WAS CAUSED BY THE INSTALLATION OF AN INSUFFICIENT PAD UNDER THE RIGHT OUTRIGGER, AND THE FACT THAT THE OPERATION WAS ATTEMPTED AN UNSTABLE SOIL SURFACE. THERE WAS AN APPARENT LACK OF PROPER TRAINING BY THE EMPLOYER.
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2019, the Chester site logged 10 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 629 workers: 1.6 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.0 for its industry. Those cases cost 169 days away from work.
Site and year
Workers
Cases
Days-away cases
Rate
Industry median
C.W. Wright Construction Company, LLC
Chester · 2019
629
10
3
1.6
1.0
The rules behind these citations
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.269 · Electric power generation, transmission, and distribution
29 CFR 1910.269(a)(2)(iii)
(iii) Each line-clearance tree trimmer who is not a qualified employee shall also be trained and competent in:
29 CFR 1910.269(n)(3)
(3) Equipotential zone. Temporary protective grounds shall be placed at such locations and arranged in such a manner that the employer can demonstrate will prevent each employee from being exposed to hazardous differences in electric potential.
29 CFR 1910.269(q)(2)(iva)
(iv) Before employees install lines parallel to existing energized lines, the employer shall make a determination of the approximate voltage to be induced in the new lines, or work shall proceed on the assumption that the induced voltage is hazardous. Unless the employer can demonstrate that the lines that employees are installing are not subject to the induction of a hazardous voltage or unless the lines are treated as energized, temporary protective grounds shall be placed at such locations and arranged in such a manner that the employer can demonstrate will prevent exposure of each employee to hazardous differences in electric potential.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Virginia the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.