Inspection 347415481 OPENED APR 10, 2024Closed
412 East Park Avenue, Anaconda, MT 59711 · Automotive Body, Paint, and Interior Repair and Maintenance · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Since 2023, OSHA inspectors have visited Cook's Collision in Montana 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Apr 10, 2024 to follow up on an earlier case, in Anaconda.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 1 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $2,074; today they stand at $1,244, 40% less.
Among repair and personal services employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $1,200 penalty. Cook's Collision averages $1,244 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Cook's Collision again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company412 East Park Avenue, Anaconda, MT 59711 · Automotive Body, Paint, and Interior Repair and Maintenance · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
412 East Park Avenue, Anaconda, MT 59711 · Automotive Body, Paint, and Interior Repair and Maintenance · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $2,074 | $1,244 | Mar 4, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 4, 2024 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)
(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.