Minneapolis, Minnesota · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160
OSHA inspectors have visited Cuenca Construction LLC in Minnesota one time.
It opened on Sep 12, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Minneapolis.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.
The proposed penalties came to $1,050; today they stand at $735, 30% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.501 (fall protection in construction), 2 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. Cuenca Construction LLC averages $735 across 1 cited inspection.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
380employers cited
33 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Cuenca Construction LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company2113 Penn Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55405 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $1,050 | $735 | Sep 28, 2016 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Sep 28, 2016 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11)
(11) Steep roofs. Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.