OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Custom Performance Coating, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Beltsville, Maryland · Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers · NAICS 332812

1inspections
19citation items
$2,400current penalties
May 13, 2020last inspection

OSHA has inspected Custom Performance Coating, Inc. once in Maryland.

The inspection began on May 13, 2020 after a fatality or catastrophe, in Beltsville.

That inspection ended with 19 citation items: 9 serious and 10 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $4,350 and now stand at $2,400, 45% lower after settlements or reviews.

Respiratory protection comes up most often in these citations: 7 items under 1910.134.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Custom Performance Coating, Inc. averages $2,400 (1 cited inspection).

1 inspection on this page followed a fatal incident.

Custom Performance Coating, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Custom Performance Coating, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344751409 OPENED MAY 13, 2020Closed

Fatality or catastrophe · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Apr 21, 2021

6802 Midcities Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705 · Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on May 12, 2020 (fatal): Employee dies after falling into industrial paint remover

At 9:52 a.m. on May 12, 2020, an employee was working for a firm that performed powder coating, sandblasting, and miscellaneous jobs on parts and other customer-related items. He had been working for the firm for three days. Earlier in the morning, the shop manager had taken a 190-liter (50-gallon) rugged plastic tote containing B17 industrial paint remover to just outside the front of the building. The tote contained 75 to 95 liters (20 to 25 gallons) of the paint remover. The paint remover was used to remove dried paint from parts when errors were made during a powder coating operation. It was a corrosive liquid with a pH of 1 to 2, with ingredients such as methylene chloride, formic acid, phenol, and hydrofluoric acid. The employee walked outside the front entrance to take his morning break. There were no witnesses or coworkers outside. Apparently the employee sat down on the tote's plastic lid. It gave way, and the employee was immersed in the paint remover. He got back out of the tote, but a major portion of his body was covered with the chemicals. He immediately suffered chemical burns. He yelled, ran to the bathroom, and stripped his clothes off. The shop manager called the fire department and started hosing the employee off with a garden hose. Upon arrival, the fire department loaded the employee into an ambulance and took him to the burn intensive care unit at Medstar Washington Hospital Center. The employee was treated for life-threatening injuries, but he died. The District of Columbia's Office of the Chief Medical Examiner's autopsy report said that the employee had suffered third- and second-degree chemical burns over 34 percent of his body. During an investigation, the shop manager said that the employee was a laborer in training. His responsibilities included preparing metal parts for powder coating, but he had not progressed to the point in training to work with the paint remover. The shop manager was primarily responsible for handling that liquid. responsible for handling that liquid.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(ii) · Storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gases
Serious$1,050$525Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.124(a) · General requirements for dipping and coating operations
Serious$1,050$630Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.124(g)(2) · General requirements for dipping and coating operations
Serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2c
29 CFR 1910.124(h)(3) · General requirements for dipping and coating operations
Serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Serious$1,050$525Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 4a
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$1,200$720Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 4b
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 4c
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 4d
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 3
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 4
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 5
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 6
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 7
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 8
29 CFR 1910.134(k) · Respiratory protection
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 9
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2) · Methylene chloride
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final
Citation 2, item 10
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 7, 2020Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1052 · Methylene chloride

29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2)

(2) Initial determination. Each employer whose employees are exposed to MC shall perform initial exposure monitoring to determine each affected employee's exposure, except under the following conditions:

29 CFR 1910.110 · Storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gases

29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(ii)

(ii) Containers when stored inside shall not be located near exits, stairways, or in areas normally used or intended for the safe exit of people.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1910.124 · General requirements for dipping and coating operations

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

Other metal coating, engraving (except jewelry and silverware), and allied services to manufacturers employers in Maryland

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.