Madison, South Dakota · Manufactured Home (Mobile Home) Manufacturing · NAICS 321991
Since 2000, OSHA inspectors have visited Custom Touch Homes, LLC in South Dakota 3 times.
The most recent inspection opened on May 30, 2025 as part of a related case, in Madison.
In all, OSHA issued 9 citation items: 6 serious and 3 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $7,636; today they stand at $6,040, 21% less.
The rule cited most here is 1910.215 (grinders and abrasive wheels), 2 times.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $4,500 penalty. Custom Touch Homes, LLC averages $3,700 across 1 cited inspection.
Custom Touch Homes, LLC also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites Custom Touch Homes, LLC again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company411 Se 12th Street, Madison, SD 57042 · Manufactured Home (Mobile Home) Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i) · Fall protection in general industry |
Other-than-serious | $5,296 | $3,700 | Sep 25, 2025 | Final |
411 Se 12th Street, Madison, SD 57042 · Manufactured Home (Mobile Home) Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
411 Se 12th Street, Madison, SD 57042 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1) · Guarding floor and wall openings and holes |
Serious | $1,500 | $1,500 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1) · Head protection |
Serious | $420 | $420 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3a 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $420 | $420 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3b 29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1) · Woodworking machinery |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3c 29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4) · Grinders and abrasive wheels |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3d 29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9) · Grinders and abrasive wheels |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1904.2(a) · Partial exemption for establishments in certain industries |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1200(h) · Hazard communication |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jul 17, 2000 | Closed |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Madison site logged 1 recordable injury or illness among about 49 workers: 2.3 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 1.8 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Touch Homes LLC Madison · 2025 | 49 | 1 | 0 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| Custom Touch Plant Madison · 2020 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 4.6 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)
(h) Post-mortem data: Increased incidence and/or severity of post-mortem findings may be indicative of maternal toxicity. This can include gross or microscopic pathological findings or organ weight data, including absolute organ weight, organ-to-body weight ratio, or organ-to-brain weight ratio. When supported by findings of adverse histopathological effects in the affected organ(s), the observation of a significant change in the average weight of suspected target organ(s) of treated dams (mothers), compared to those in the control group, may be considered evidence of maternal toxicity.
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1)
(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee wears a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.