OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Dal Machine Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Rogers, Minnesota · Machine Shops · NAICS 332710

2inspections
7citation items
$1,450current penalties
Mar 15, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Dal Machine Inc 2 times in Minnesota since 2010.

The latest one began on Mar 15, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Otsego.

Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 5 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $1,750 and now stand at $1,450, 17% lower after settlements or reviews.

comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 5206.700.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Dal Machine Inc averages $700 (1 cited inspection).

Dal Machine Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2010 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Dal Machine Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341327831 OPENED MAR 15, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 7 employees at the site · Closed Apr 25, 2016

14162 Northdale Blvd, Otsego, MN 55374 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
 Serious$450$315Mar 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools
 Serious$225$158Mar 22, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 3 Serious$225$158Mar 22, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv) · Hazard communication
 Other-than-serious$100$70Mar 22, 2016Final

Inspection 315062208 OPENED NOV 4, 2010Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 7 employees at the site · Closed Dec 13, 2010

14162 Northdale Blvd, Rogers, MN 55374 · Machine Shops · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Serious$250$250Nov 17, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 2 Serious$500$500Nov 17, 2010Closed
Citation 2, item 1 Other-than-serious$0$0Nov 17, 2010Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1820.6530

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv)

(iv) The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.242 · Hand and power tools

29 CFR 1910.242(b)

(b) Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.

29 CFR 5205.116

29 CFR 5206.700

Other machine shops employers in Minnesota

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.