OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Darko, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Twinsburg, Ohio · General Warehousing and Storage · NAICS 493110

2inspections
10citation items
$5,415current penalties
Nov 14, 2016last inspection

Darko, Inc. has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Ohio, the first in 2008.

OSHA's last visit started on Nov 14, 2016 after a complaint, in Twinsburg.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 10 citation items: 7 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $10,229 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $5,415, down 47%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.134, respiratory protection (4 items).

For context, across all transportation and warehousing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,555. Darko, Inc. averages $4,365 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Darko, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2008 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Darko, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341926467 OPENED NOV 14, 2016Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 52 employees at the site · Closed Feb 10, 2017

2026 Summit Commerce Park, Twinsburg, OH 44087 · Other Construction Material Merchant Wholesalers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$3,741$1,870Jan 5, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$0$0Jan 5, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2) · Respiratory protection
Serious$0$0Jan 5, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 1d
29 CFR 1910.134(k) · Respiratory protection
Serious$0$0Jan 5, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
Serious$4,988$2,495Jan 5, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1) · Portable fire extinguishers
Other-than-serious$0$0Jan 5, 2017Final

Inspection 312545114 OPENED AUG 27, 2008Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 23 employees at the site · Closed Feb 19, 2009

1499 Enterprise Drive, Twinsburg, OH 44087 · General Warehousing and Storage · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(8) · Guarding floor and wall openings and holes
Serious$750$525Aug 29, 2008Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2) · Portable fire extinguishers
Serious$750$525Aug 29, 2008Closed
Citation 2, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Aug 29, 2008Closed
Citation 2, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1200(h) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Aug 29, 2008Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)

(h) Post-mortem data: Increased incidence and/or severity of post-mortem findings may be indicative of maternal toxicity. This can include gross or microscopic pathological findings or organ weight data, including absolute organ weight, organ-to-body weight ratio, or organ-to-brain weight ratio. When supported by findings of adverse histopathological effects in the affected organ(s), the observation of a significant change in the average weight of suspected target organ(s) of treated dams (mothers), compared to those in the control group, may be considered evidence of maternal toxicity.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)

(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.

29 CFR 1910.157 · Portable fire extinguishers

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.23 · Guarding floor and wall openings and holes

Other general warehousing and storage employers in Ohio

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.