OSHA has inspected David Luis 2 times in Texas since 2014.
The latest one began on Sep 6, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Cypress.
Those inspections ended with 4 citation items: 4 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $11,480 and now stand at $7,644, 33% lower after settlements or reviews.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and David Luis averages $2,328 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites David Luis again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company11827 White Flint Ln, Cypress, TX 77433 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $3,880 | $2,328 | Sep 12, 2018 | Final |
5200 Pointe West Circle, Richmond, TX 77469 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,960 | Feb 28, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $2,800 | $1,960 | Feb 28, 2014 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2) · Fall protection training in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,396 | Feb 28, 2014 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21)
(21) Personal fall arrest systems shall be inspected prior to each use for wear, damage and other deterioration, and defective components shall be removed from service.
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)
(2) The employer shall assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified in the following areas:
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.