OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

David Morse: OSHA inspections and violations

Denver, Colorado · Residential Remodelers · NAICS 236118

1inspections
10citation items
$4,500current penalties
May 8, 2020last inspection

David Morse has one OSHA inspection on record in Colorado.

OSHA opened it on May 8, 2020 as part of a related case, in Denver.

From that inspection OSHA issued 10 citation items: 10 serious.

OSHA proposed $8,676 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $4,500, down 48%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.451, scaffolds, general requirements (5 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. David Morse averages $4,500 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

David Morse: OSHA citation items per year, 2020 to 2020
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Colorado · latest 90 days of OSHA records

135employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Colorado: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Colorado

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch David Morse and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344746235 OPENED MAY 8, 2020Closed

Unprogrammed related · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Mar 31, 2023

10150 E Virgina Avenue Building 18, Denver, CO 80247 · Residential Remodelers · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) · Construction safety programs
 Serious$2,892$2,500Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$2,892$2,000Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2c
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2d
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 2e
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$0$0Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
 Serious$2,892$0Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1926.454(b) · Scaffold training
 Serious$0$0Jun 16, 2020Final
Citation 1, item 3c
29 CFR 1926.1060(a) · Ladder and stairway training
 Serious$0$0Jun 16, 2020Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.1060 · Ladder and stairway training

29 CFR 1926.1060(a)

(a) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.

29 CFR 1926.20 · Construction safety programs

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2)

(2) Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)

(b) Scaffold platform construction. (1) Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds shall be fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as follows:

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

Other residential remodelers employers in Colorado

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Colorado the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.