OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Exceltech Inc: OSHA inspections and violations

Mcminnville, Oregon · Bare Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing · NAICS 334412

2inspections
9citation items
$570current penalties
Jul 28, 2016last inspection

OSHA has inspected Exceltech Inc 2 times in Oregon since 2002.

The latest one began on Jul 28, 2016 as a planned inspection, in Mcminnville.

Those inspections ended with 9 citation items: 6 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $670 and now stand at $570, 15% lower after settlements or reviews.

Hazard communication comes up most often in these citations: 3 items under 1910.1200.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Exceltech Inc averages $400 (1 cited inspection).

Exceltech Inc: OSHA citation items per year, 2002 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Exceltech Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341656924 OPENED JUL 28, 2016Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 12 employees at the site · Closed Apr 27, 2017

2919 Ne Rivergate St Ste 401d, Mcminnville, OR 97128 · Bare Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
 Serious$200$200Oct 21, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
 Serious$0$0Oct 21, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR OAR 437-001-0765(1)-2
 Serious$200$200Oct 21, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR OAR 437-001-0765(4)-9
 Serious$0$0Oct 21, 2016Final
Citation 2, item 3
29 CFR OAR 437-002-0134(1)(B)
 Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 21, 2016Final

Inspection 305576852 OPENED SEP 4, 2002Closed

Planned · Complete · Health · 36 employees at the site · Closed Sep 19, 2003

2919 Ne Rivergate #401d, Mcminnville, OR 97128 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i) · Lead in general industry
 Serious$270$170Oct 4, 2002Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i) · Lead in general industry
 Serious$0$0Oct 4, 2002Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
 Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 4, 2002Final
Citation 2, item 3
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements
 Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 4, 2002Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1025 · Lead in general industry

29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i)

(3) Compliance program. (i) Each employer shall establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, and interim levels if applicable, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls in accordance with the implementation schedule in paragraph (e)(1).

29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i)

(l) Employee information and training—(1) Training program. (i) Each employer who has a workplace in which there is a potential exposure to airborne lead at any level shall inform employees of the content of Appendices A and B of this regulation.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1910.132 · Personal protective equipment, general requirements

Other bare printed circuit board manufacturing employers in Oregon

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.