OSHA has inspected FGF Brands once in Indiana.
The inspection began on May 26, 2026 on a referral, in Lebanon; the case is still open.
That inspection ended with 2 citation items: 2 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $6,000 and now stand at $3,900, 35% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,872, and FGF Brands averages $3,900 (1 cited inspection).
FGF Brands also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites FGF Brands again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company152 South Mount Zion Road, Lebanon, IN 46052 · Commercial Bakeries · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i) · Lockout/tagout |
Serious | $3,000 | $1,950 | Sep 17, 2026 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $3,000 | $1,950 | Sep 17, 2026 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Lebanon site logged 9 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 227 workers: 3.5 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 3.6 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGF Brands LLC Lebanon · 2025 | 227 | 9 | 0 | 3.5 | 3.6 |
| FGF Brands Lebanon Lebanon · 2024 | 215 | 6 | 0 | 2.4 | 3.6 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i)
(4) Energy control procedure. (i) Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.