OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Hettrick Electric: OSHA inspections and violations

Gardnerville, Nevada · Storage Battery Manufacturing · NAICS 335911

2inspections
6citation items
$13,682current penalties
Dec 21, 2022last inspection

OSHA has inspected Hettrick Electric 2 times in Nevada since 2001.

The latest one began on Dec 21, 2022 on a referral, in Carson City.

Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 4 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $17,103 and now stand at $13,682, 20% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Hettrick Electric averages $13,682 (1 cited inspection).

Hettrick Electric: OSHA citation items per year, 2001 to 2022
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Hettrick Electric again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 346403355 OPENED DEC 21, 2022Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 14 employees at the site · Closed Oct 23, 2023

2801 Lockheed Way, Carson City, NV 89706 · Storage Battery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1 Serious$3,730$2,984May 23, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1) · Working near live electrical parts
Serious$4,018$3,214May 23, 2023Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i) · Safeguards for personnel protection
Serious$3,730$2,984May 23, 2023Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR NEVADA REVISED STATUTES 618.383(1
Serious$5,625$4,500May 23, 2023Final

Inspection 304597073 OPENED AUG 20, 2001Closed

Planned · Complete · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Sep 24, 2001

1820 Highway 395 (remax Office Project), Gardnerville, NV 89410 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(b)(1) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Aug 20, 2001Closed
Citation 1, item 2 Other-than-serious$0$0Aug 20, 2001Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(b)(1)

(b) Scope and application. (1) This section requires chemical manufacturers or importers to classify the hazards of chemicals which they produce or import, and all employers to provide information to their employees about the hazardous chemicals to which they are exposed, by means of a hazard communication program, labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and information and training. In addition, this section requires distributors to transmit the required information to employers. (Employers who do not produce or import chemicals need only focus on those parts of this rule that deal with establishing a workplace program and communicating information to their workers.)

29 CFR 1910.332 · Training

29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1)

(b) Content of training—(1) Practices addressed in this standard. Employees shall be trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by §§ 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertain to their respective job assignments.

29 CFR 1910.333 · Working near live electrical parts

29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1)

(1) Deenergized parts. Live parts to which an employee may be exposed shall be deenergized before the employee works on or near them, unless the employer can demonstrate that deenergizing introduces additional or increased hazards or is infeasible due to equipment design or operational limitations. Live parts that operate at less than 50 volts to ground need not be deenergized if there will be no increased exposure to electrical burns or to explosion due to electric arcs.

29 CFR 1910.335 · Safeguards for personnel protection

29 CFR 6180.5560

Other storage battery manufacturing employers in Nevada

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.