OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Jake Heiser: OSHA inspections and violations

Mc Farland, Wisconsin · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130

1inspections
3citation items
$1,500current penalties
Nov 29, 2017last inspection

OSHA inspectors have visited Jake Heiser in Wisconsin one time.

It opened on Nov 29, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Mc Farland.

In all, OSHA issued 3 citation items: 1 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

The proposed penalties came to $3,803; today they stand at $1,500, 61% less.

Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,078 penalty. Jake Heiser averages $1,500 across 1 cited inspection.

Jake Heiser: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Jake Heiser again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342806288 OPENED NOV 29, 2017Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Closed Dec 27, 2017

6050 Sugar River Lane, Mc Farland, WI 53558 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$3,803$1,500Dec 8, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 8, 2017Final
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Other-than-serious$0$0Dec 8, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i)

(4) Refresher training and evaluation. (i) Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, shall be conducted as required by paragraph (l)(4)(ii) to ensure that the operator has the knowledge and skills needed to operate the powered industrial truck safely.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1)

(b) Certification of training. (1) The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.

Other framing contractors employers in Wisconsin

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.