OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Jay Rice Contracting: OSHA inspections and violations

St. Clair, Missouri · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · NAICS 236115

2inspections
10citation items
$3,100current penalties
Jul 25, 2017last inspection

Jay Rice Contracting has 2 OSHA inspections on record in Missouri, the first in 2010.

OSHA's last visit started on Jul 25, 2017, in Saint Clair.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 10 citation items: 10 serious.

OSHA proposed $15,572 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $3,100, down 80%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.501, fall protection in construction (3 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,079. Jay Rice Contracting averages $1,000 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Jay Rice Contracting: OSHA citation items per year, 2010 to 2017
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Jay Rice Contracting again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 342497815 OPENED JUL 25, 2017Closed

Unprogrammed other · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Jan 31, 2018

Near Caddy Court, Saint Clair, MO 63077 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) · Construction safety programs
Serious$2,716$200Sep 19, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$3,803$400Sep 19, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
Serious$0$0Sep 19, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v) · Aerial lifts
Serious$3,803$400Sep 19, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1) · Scaffold training
Serious$0$0Sep 19, 2017Final

Inspection 314387291 OPENED APR 9, 2010Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed May 6, 2010

286 Duffers Dr., St. Clair, MO 63077 · New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction
Serious$750$525Apr 14, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v) · Aerial lifts
Serious$1,500$525Apr 14, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
Serious$1,500$525Apr 14, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 4a
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$1,500$525Apr 14, 2010Closed
Citation 1, item 4b
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14) · Fall protection in construction
Serious$0$0Apr 14, 2010Closed

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.100 · Hard hats in construction

29 CFR 1926.100(a)

(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.

29 CFR 1926.20 · Construction safety programs

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2)

(2) Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.

29 CFR 1926.453 · Aerial lifts

29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v)

(v) A body belt shall be worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift.

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other new single-family housing construction (except for-sale builders) employers in Missouri

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.