OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

John Morrell, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Sioux Falls, South Dakota · Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering · NAICS 311611

3inspections
6citation items
$7,290current penalties
Jan 7, 2016last inspection

Since 1982, OSHA inspectors have visited John Morrell, Inc. in South Dakota 3 times.

The most recent inspection opened on Jan 7, 2016 after a complaint, in Sioux Falls.

In all, OSHA issued 6 citation items: 3 serious and 3 other-than-serious.

The penalties, $7,290 in total, stand where OSHA first set them.

The rule cited most here is 1926.1101 (asbestos in construction), 2 times.

Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $4,873 penalty. John Morrell, Inc. averages $6,650 across 1 cited inspection.

It reported 2 severe injuries to OSHA since 2015.

John Morrell, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 1982 to 2016
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

South Dakota · latest 90 days of OSHA records

30employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in South Dakota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in South Dakota

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch John Morrell, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 341164473 OPENED JAN 7, 2016Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 3,400 employees at the site · Closed Aug 1, 2016

1400 North Weber Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 · Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) · Ladders in construction
Other-than-serious$3,400$2,400Jun 2, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i) · Asbestos in construction
Serious$0$4,250Jun 2, 2016Final
Citation 1, item 2c
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(vi) · Asbestos in construction
Serious$0$0Jun 2, 2016Final

Inspection 1640754 OPENED AUG 23, 1984Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 2,985 employees at the site · Closed May 1, 1985

1400 N Weber Ave, Sioux Falls, SD 57101 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding
Serious$640$640Oct 18, 1984Closed
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(2) · Exit route design
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 18, 1984Closed
Citation 2, item 2
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 18, 1984Closed

Inspection 18795757 OPENED APR 2, 1982Closed

Complaint · No inspection · Health · Closed May 1, 2011

Sioux Falls, SD 00000 · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 2 reports on file.

Oct 10, 2016, Sioux Falls: Hospitalization · fractures · wrist(s)

An employee was stepping out of the elevator when her foot was caught on the 1/2-inch rise from the elevator floor to the work floor. She tripped and fractured her left wrist, requiring surgery.

Jan 15, 2016, Sioux Falls: Hospitalization · cuts, lacerations · knee(s)

An employee was injured while hanging a dropped hog onto a rail with a chain hoist. The hog and hanger assembly fell, landed on a floor conveyor, and bounced off striking the employee on the outside of his knee. The hangar portion of the assembly caused a puncture wound to the knee and lacerated a tendon.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)

(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.

29 CFR 1910.36 · Exit route design

29 CFR 1910.36(d)(2)

(2) Exit route doors must be free of any device or alarm that could restrict emergency use of the exit route if the device or alarm fails.

29 CFR 1926.1053 · Ladders in construction

29 CFR 1926.1101 · Asbestos in construction

Other animal (except poultry) slaughtering employers in South Dakota

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in South Dakota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.