OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Juan Badillo: OSHA inspections and violations

Cape Charles, Virginia · Masonry Contractors · NAICS 238140

1inspections
10citation items
$1,645current penalties
Aug 21, 2018last inspection

OSHA has inspected Juan Badillo once in Virginia.

The inspection began on Aug 21, 2018 after a complaint, in Cape Charles.

That inspection ended with 10 citation items: 10 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $3,290 and now stand at $1,645, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.

Scaffolds, general requirements comes up most often in these citations: 5 items under 1926.451.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Juan Badillo averages $1,645 (1 cited inspection).

Juan Badillo: OSHA citation items per year, 2018 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Juan Badillo again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343409389 OPENED AUG 21, 2018Closed

Complaint · Partial · Safety · 6 employees at the site · Closed Oct 15, 2019

300 Mason Avenue, Cape Charles, VA 23310 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(3) · Construction safety programs
 Serious$1,645$822Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1d
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1e
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1f
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1g
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2) · Rules for each type of scaffold
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1h
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(4) · Rules for each type of scaffold
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 1i
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
 Serious$0$0Oct 18, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
 Serious$1,645$822Oct 18, 2018Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)

(e) Written hazard communication program. (1) Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:

29 CFR 1926.20 · Construction safety programs

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(3)

(3) The use of any machinery, tool, material, or equipment which is not in compliance with any applicable requirement of this part is prohibited. Such machine, tool, material, or equipment shall either be identified as unsafe by tagging or locking the controls to render them inoperable or shall be physically removed from its place of operation.

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1)

(a) Capacity. (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5) and (g) of this section, each scaffold and scaffold component shall be capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least 4 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it.

29 CFR 1926.452 · Rules for each type of scaffold

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

Other masonry contractors employers in Virginia

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.