OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

KDB & Co.: OSHA inspections and violations

Hamden, Connecticut · Structural Steel and Precast Concrete Contractors · NAICS 238120

1inspections
8citation items
$16,800current penalties
Jan 22, 2015last inspection

KDB & Co. has one OSHA inspection on record in Connecticut.

OSHA opened it on Jan 22, 2015 on a referral, in Hamden.

From that inspection OSHA issued 8 citation items: 8 serious.

OSHA proposed $16,800 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.602, earthmovers and forklifts in construction (2 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. KDB & Co. averages $16,800 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

KDB & Co.: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2015
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Connecticut · latest 90 days of OSHA records

85employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Connecticut: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Connecticut

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch KDB & Co. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 340219781 OPENED JAN 22, 2015Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Dec 27, 2019

2335 State Street, Hamden, CT 06517 · Structural Steel and Precast Concrete Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Jan 22, 2015: Three employees sustain multiple fractures in fall from elev

At 2:00 p.m. on January 22, 2015, Employees #1 owner of a construction services company, Employee #2, and Employee #3 were installing gutters on a systems-engineered commercial building. Employees #1, #2, and #3 stood on a wooden pallet held by the forks of a Genie forklift operated by a coworker. The coworker hoisted the pallet and employees at an angle of approximately 45 degrees up to the roof. Employees #2 and #3 stepped onto the roof while Employee #1, the owner, remained on the pallet. When they finished their work, Employees #2 and #3 stepped back onto the pallet, which was still being held by the forklift. The forklift was in an unstable position. Both of its left wheels were on the ground, but the right front wheel was on an upward slope of approximately 65 degrees, and the right rear wheel was off the ground. As Employees #2 and #3 rejoined Employee #1 on the pallet, the pallet tilted. Employees #1, #2, and #3 fell to the frozen ground, a fall height of between 19 feet and 21 feet. Emergency services were called, and Employees #1, #2, and #3 were transported to the hospital and admitted. The owner was treated for a punctured lung, fractured ribs, a fractured arm, and a fractured pelvis. Employee #2 was treated for a fractured pelvis and bleeding. Employee #3 was treated for a fractured wrist and a fractured pelvis.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
Serious$2,800$2,800May 28, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v) · Scaffolds, general requirements
Serious$2,800$2,800May 28, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii) · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction
Serious$0$0May 28, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) · Scaffolds, general requirements
Serious$2,800$2,800May 28, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi) · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction
Serious$2,800$2,800May 28, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 5
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1) · Fall protection
Serious$2,800$2,800May 28, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 6a
29 CFR 1926.454(a) · Scaffold training
Serious$2,800$2,800May 28, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 6b
29 CFR 1926.761(b) · Training
Serious$0$0May 28, 2015Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i)

(l) Operator training. (1) Safe operation. (i) The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v)

(v) Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied.

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii)

(vii) For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee shall be protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.454 · Scaffold training

29 CFR 1926.602 · Earthmovers and forklifts in construction

29 CFR 1926.760 · Fall protection

29 CFR 1926.761 · Training

Other structural steel and precast concrete contractors employers in Connecticut

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Connecticut the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.