OSHA has inspected Kenway Engineering Inc 3 times in Minnesota since 2009.
The latest one began on Feb 27, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Fairmont.
Those inspections ended with 9 citation items: 6 serious and 3 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $1,625 and now stand at $1,400, 14% lower after settlements or reviews.
Methylene chloride comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1910.1052.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Kenway Engineering Inc averages $158 (1 cited inspection).
Want to know if OSHA cites Kenway Engineering Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company2555 Lake Ave, Fairmont, MN 56031 · Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $225 | $158 | Mar 8, 2018 | Final |
2555 Lake Ave, Fairmont, MN 56031 · Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements |
Serious | $375 | $262 | Oct 15, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1) · Eye and face protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Oct 15, 2012 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii) · Gas welding and cutting |
Other-than-serious | $150 | $105 | Oct 15, 2012 | Closed |
2555 Lake Ave, Fairmont, MN 56031 · Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2) · Methylene chloride |
Serious | $375 | $375 | Apr 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.1052(i)(3)(i) · Methylene chloride |
Serious | $375 | $375 | Apr 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.178(l) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks |
Other-than-serious | $125 | $125 | Apr 23, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Apr 23, 2009 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2)
(2) Initial determination. Each employer whose employees are exposed to MC shall perform initial exposure monitoring to determine each affected employee's exposure, except under the following conditions:
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)
(d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection. (1) The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)
(a) General requirements. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.