Richardson, Texas · Framing Contractors · NAICS 238130
OSHA has inspected Levit Hernandez 2 times in Texas since 2018.
The latest one began on May 30, 2024 as a planned inspection, in Princeton; the case is still open.
Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $11,484 and still stand at $11,484.
Fall protection in construction comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 1926.501.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and Levit Hernandez averages $5,742 (2 cited inspections).
Want to know if OSHA cites Levit Hernandez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company610 Wild Goose Ln, Princeton, TX 75407 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) · Eye and face protection in construction |
Serious | $2,765 | $2,765 | Sep 27, 2024 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $4,839 | $4,839 | Sep 27, 2024 | Final |
7925 Sunflower Lane, Richardson, TX 75082 · Framing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $3,880 | $3,880 | May 11, 2018 | Final |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)
(a) General. (1) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)
(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.