Danvers, Massachusetts · Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing · NAICS 333249
OSHA inspectors have visited M & H Engineering in Massachusetts one time.
It opened on Jun 6, 2019 after a complaint, in Danvers.
In all, OSHA issued 2 citation items: 2 serious.
The proposed penalties came to $11,934; today they stand at $8,354, 30% less.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. M & H Engineering averages $8,354 across 1 cited inspection.
M & H Engineering also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Massachusetts · latest 90 days of OSHA records
235employers cited
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Massachusetts: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Massachusetts
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch M & H Engineering and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company183 Newbury Street #1, Danvers, MA 01923 · Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $6,630 | $4,641 | Sep 11, 2019 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools |
Serious | $5,304 | $3,713 | Sep 11, 2019 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Danvers site logged 1 recordable injury or illness among about 54 workers: 1.7 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 2.7 for its industry.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M&H Engineering Co., Inc. Danvers · 2025 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 1.7 | 2.7 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
29 CFR 1910.242(b)
(b) Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Massachusetts the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.