Inspection 348029984 OPENED FEB 7, 2025Closed
48241 Genesis Drive, Coshocton, OH 43812 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
Since 2007, OSHA inspectors have visited M.E.B. Systems, Inc in Ohio 4 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Feb 7, 2025 as a planned inspection, in Coshocton.
In all, OSHA issued 8 citation items: 7 serious and 1 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $5,050; today they stand at $2,400, 52% less.
The rule cited most here is 1926.502 (fall protection systems), 4 times.
Among construction employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,080 penalty. M.E.B. Systems, Inc averages $2,000 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites M.E.B. Systems, Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company48241 Genesis Drive, Coshocton, OH 43812 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
142 Arlington Ave Nw, Canton, OH 44708 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,000 | Nov 12, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2a 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $2,000 | $1,000 | Nov 12, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2b 29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 12, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2c 29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(i) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 12, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2d 29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(iii) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 12, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2e 29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii) · Fall protection systems |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 12, 2015 | Final |
1314 Edison St. Nw., Hartville, OH 44632 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
No citations from this inspection.
2924 Lincoln Way W., Massillon, OH 44646 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1926.100(a) · Hard hats in construction |
Other-than-serious | $450 | $0 | Mar 20, 2007 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) · Fall protection in construction |
Serious | $600 | $400 | Mar 20, 2007 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i)
(l) Operator training. (1) Safe operation. (i) The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).
29 CFR 1926.100(a)
(a) Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10)
(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.