OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

M3 Insulation: OSHA inspections and violations

Miles, Texas · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · NAICS 238310

1inspections
4citation items
$14,517current penalties
Jun 21, 2024last inspection

OSHA has inspected M3 Insulation once in Texas.

The inspection began on Jun 21, 2024 on a referral, in Miles; the case is still open.

That inspection ended with 4 citation items: 4 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $14,517 and still stand at $14,517.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,078, and M3 Insulation averages $14,517 (1 cited inspection).

It reported 1 severe injury to OSHA since 2015.

M3 Insulation: OSHA citation items per year, 2024 to 2024
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites M3 Insulation again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 347568412 OPENED JUN 21, 2024Open

Referral · Partial · Safety · 3 employees at the site · Open

8150 Thompson Rd, Miles, TX 76861 · Drywall and Insulation Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
 Serious$2,765$2,765Jul 24, 2024Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
 Serious$2,765$2,765Jul 24, 2024Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1) · Scaffolds, general requirements
 Serious$4,148$4,148Jul 24, 2024Final
Citation 1, item 4
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) · Fall protection training in construction
 Serious$4,839$4,839Jul 24, 2024Final

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 1 report on file.

Jun 13, 2024, Miles: Hospitalization · injuries to the brain, spinal cord and soft tissue injuries · head and extremities

An employee was working from a scissor lift installing insulation and fell 10 feet to the ground below. The employee sustained a concussion, left wrist fracture, a dislocated shoulder that required surgery and a rib contusion.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)

(h) Employee information and training. (1) Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)

(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.

29 CFR 1926.451 · Scaffolds, general requirements

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)

(g) Fall protection. (1) Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1) (i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers.

29 CFR 1926.503 · Fall protection training in construction

Other drywall and insulation contractors employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.