OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Manuel Lopez: OSHA inspections and violations

Blacklick, Ohio · Roofing Contractors · NAICS 238160

1inspections
3citation items
$9,424current penalties
Nov 7, 2018last inspection

OSHA has inspected Manuel Lopez once in Ohio.

The inspection began on Nov 7, 2018 as a planned inspection, in Blacklick.

That inspection ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $9,424 and still stand at $9,424.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for construction employers since 2015 is $3,079, and Manuel Lopez averages $9,424 (1 cited inspection).

Manuel Lopez: OSHA citation items per year, 2018 to 2018
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Manuel Lopez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343587119 OPENED NOV 7, 2018Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 2 employees at the site · Closed Nov 1, 2022

8683 Conestoga Valley, Blacklick, OH 43004 · Roofing Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1) · Construction safety programs
 Serious$2,772$2,772Nov 15, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) · Fall protection in construction
 Serious$2,772$2,772Nov 15, 2018Final
Citation 1, item 3
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15) · Fall protection systems
 Serious$3,880$3,880Nov 15, 2018Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1926.20 · Construction safety programs

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1)

(b) Accident prevention responsibilities. (1) It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.

29 CFR 1926.501 · Fall protection in construction

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)

(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.

29 CFR 1926.502 · Fall protection systems

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)

(15) Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows:

Other roofing contractors employers in Ohio

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.