Prior Lake, Minnesota · Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing · NAICS 332420
OSHA has inspected Miratech Corporation 2 times in Minnesota since 2017.
The latest one began on Dec 18, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Prior Lake.
Those inspections ended with 7 citation items: 3 serious and 4 other-than-serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $3,000 and now stand at $2,100, 30% lower after settlements or reviews.
comes up most often in these citations: 2 items under 5205.1200.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Miratech Corporation averages $1,050 (2 cited inspections).
Miratech Corporation also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Minnesota · latest 90 days of OSHA records
380employers cited
2 of them in the same industry
Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Minnesota: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.
See who gets cited nextLatest cited in Minnesota
Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Miratech Corporation and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.
Watch this company5380 Cottonwood Ln Se, Prior Lake, MN 55372 · Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 | Other-than-serious | $300 | $210 | Jan 9, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 | Other-than-serious | $300 | $210 | Jan 9, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 | Other-than-serious | $300 | $210 | Jan 9, 2020 | Final |
5380 Cottonwood Ln Se, Prior Lake, MN 55372 · Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $750 | $525 | Mar 1, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.304(b)(4)(ii)(b) · Grounding and circuit protection |
Serious | $450 | $315 | Mar 1, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1) · Hexavalent chromium |
Serious | $600 | $420 | Mar 1, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 1 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $300 | $210 | Mar 1, 2017 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2022, the Prior Lake site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 49 workers: 7.9 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 0.3 for its industry. Those cases cost 4 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miratech Prior Lake · 2022 | 49 | 3 | 1 | 7.9 | 0.3 |
Included with any plan: 3 more yearly logs from these sites, back to 2019, with each site's average rate over its latest three years. Already a subscriber? Sign in.
See plansCurrent text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)
(l) Communication of chromium (VI) hazards to employees—(1) Hazard communication—general—(i) Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors and employers shall comply with all requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (§ 1910.1200) for chromium (VI).
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i)
(i) All respirators shall be stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals, and they shall be packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)
(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Minnesota the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.