OSHA has inspected Mobile Mark, Inc. 2 times in Illinois since 2019.
The latest one began on Oct 22, 2019 after a complaint, in Itasca.
Those inspections ended with 3 citation items: 3 serious.
Penalties were first proposed at $24,724 and now stand at $12,365, 50% lower after settlements or reviews.
How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $3,600, and Mobile Mark, Inc. averages $6,182 (2 cited inspections).
Mobile Mark, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites Mobile Mark, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1140 W. Thorndale Ave., Itasca, IL 60143 · Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.151(c) · First aid and eyewash |
Serious | $5,205 | $2,605 | Mar 20, 2020 | Final |
1140 W. Thorndale Ave., Itasca, IL 60143 · Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.140(d)(3) · Personal fall protection systems |
Serious | $7,374 | $3,687 | Mar 20, 2020 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 2 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii) · Machine guarding |
Serious | $12,145 | $6,073 | Mar 20, 2020 | Final |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2025, the Itasca site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 108 workers: 2.7 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 0.0 for its industry. Those cases cost 66 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Mark Itasca · 2025 | 108 | 3 | 3 | 2.7 | 0.0 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.140(d)(3)
(3) Body belts. Body belts are prohibited as part of a personal fall arrest system.
29 CFR 1910.151(c)
(c) Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii)
(ii) The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.