Since 2011, OSHA inspectors have visited Muskogee Technology in Alabama 2 times.
The most recent inspection opened on Mar 16, 2017 as a planned inspection, in Atmore.
In all, OSHA issued 9 citation items: 3 serious and 6 other-than-serious.
The proposed penalties came to $12,302; today they stand at $9,850, 20% less.
The rule cited most here is 1910.134 (respiratory protection), 5 times.
Among manufacturing employers, the typical cited inspection since 2015 ends with a $3,600 penalty. Muskogee Technology averages $2,200 across 1 cited inspection.
Want to know if OSHA cites Muskogee Technology again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company601 Muskogee Boulevard, Atmore, AL 36502 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 OSH Act Section 5(a)(1) · General Duty Clause |
Serious | $3,802 | $2,200 | May 3, 2017 | Final |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | May 3, 2017 | Final |
601 Muskogee Boulevard, Atmore, AL 36502 · All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i) · Lockout/tagout |
Serious | $4,250 | $3,825 | Nov 29, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 1, item 3 29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii) · Gas welding and cutting |
Serious | $4,250 | $3,825 | Nov 29, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 4a 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 29, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 4b 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 29, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 4c 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 29, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 4d 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 29, 2011 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 5 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Nov 29, 2011 | Closed |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)
(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)
(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2)
(2) Deep breathing. In a normal standing position, the subject shall breathe slowly and deeply, taking caution so as not to hyperventilate.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.