Lincoln City, Oregon · Solid Waste Collection · NAICS 562111
Nextgen Inc has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Oregon, the first in 2009.
OSHA's last visit started on May 14, 2024 as a planned inspection, in Lincoln City.
Across those inspections OSHA issued 13 citation items: 6 serious and 7 other-than-serious.
OSHA proposed $200 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.
Most often, OSHA cited 1910.134, respiratory protection (5 items).
For context, across all staffing, cleaning and waste services employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $2,201. Nextgen Inc averages $50 over 2 cited inspections in that time.
Nextgen Inc also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.
Want to know if OSHA cites Nextgen Inc again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.
Watch this company1726 Se Highway 101, Lincoln City, OR 97367 · Solid Waste Collection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR OAR 437-001-0765(4)-9 |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Jun 25, 2024 | Final |
1726 Se Highway 101, Lincoln City, OR 97367 · Solid Waste Collection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1a 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $100 | $100 | Mar 10, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1b 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 10, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1c 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 10, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1d 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 10, 2015 | Final |
| Citation 1, item 1e 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1) · Respiratory protection |
Serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 10, 2015 | Final |
1726 Se Hwy 101, Lincoln City, OR 97367 · Solid Waste Collection · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps
| Citation and rule | Type | Proposed | Current | Issued | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation 1, item 1 29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii) · Gas welding and cutting |
Serious | $100 | $100 | Mar 3, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 2 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2) · Electrical equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 3 29 CFR 1910.242(b) · Hand and power tools |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 4 29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 5 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) · Personal protective equipment, general requirements |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 6 | Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2009 | Closed |
| Citation 2, item 7 29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1) · General requirements |
Other-than-serious | $0 | $0 | Mar 3, 2009 | Closed |
From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.
In 2024, the Lincoln City site logged 3 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 43 workers: 31.6 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 3.8 for its industry. Those cases cost 1 days away from work.
| Site and year | Workers | Cases | Days-away cases | Rate | Industry median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Lincoln Sanitary Service Lincoln City · 2024 | 43 | 3 | 1 | 31.6 | 3.8 |
Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2)
(2) The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii)
(ii) In addition, the employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)
(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.