OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Nutraferma, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

North Sioux City, South Dakota · Other Animal Food Manufacturing · NAICS 311119

3inspections
5citation items
$7,800current penalties
May 10, 2019last inspection

Nutraferma, Inc. has 3 OSHA inspections on record in South Dakota, the first in 2015.

OSHA's last visit started on May 10, 2019 after a complaint, in North Sioux City.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 5 citation items: 3 serious and 2 other-than-serious.

OSHA proposed $13,560 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $7,800, down 42%.

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $4,874. Nutraferma, Inc. averages $2,600 over 3 cited inspections in that time.

It reported 2 severe injuries to OSHA since 2015.

Nutraferma, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Nutraferma, Inc. again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 344018528 OPENED MAY 10, 2019Closed

Complaint · Partial · Health · 20 employees at the site · Closed Jul 12, 2021

501 South Flynn, North Sioux City, SD 57049 · Other Animal Food Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.272(j)(1) · Grain handling facilities
Serious$5,834$1,000Oct 17, 2019Final
Citation 2, item 1
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6) · Hazard communication
Other-than-serious$0$0Oct 17, 2019Final

Inspection 342581337 OPENED AUG 24, 2017Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 19 employees at the site · Closed Jan 18, 2018

501 South Flynn, North Sioux City, SD 57049 · Other Animal Food Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Incident on Aug 23, 2017: Employee's foot is caught in gear mechanism during cleaning

At 10:30 p.m. on August 23, 2017, an employee was cleaning a machine when the employee's foot because stuck in a gear mechanism. The employee suffered a partial amputation of his foot and was hospitalized.

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3) · Belts, pulleys and power-transmission parts
Serious$2,463$2,000Oct 25, 2017Final
Citation 1, item 2
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i) · Lockout/tagout
Other-than-serious$2,463$2,000Oct 25, 2017Final

Inspection 340697804 OPENED JUN 2, 2015Closed

Referral · Partial · Safety · 19 employees at the site · Closed Mar 23, 2016

501 South Flynn, North Sioux City, SD 57049 · Other Animal Food Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$2,800$2,800Nov 12, 2015Final

Severe injury reports

Employers must report any work-related amputation, in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye to OSHA within 24 hours. 2 reports on file.

Aug 23, 2017, North Sioux City: Hospitalization, amputation · amputations · heel(s)

An employee was cleaning a fermenter room when his right foot was caught in a machine's roller mechanism, partially amputating his right heel.

May 27, 2015, North Sioux City: Amputation · amputations · fingertip(s)

An employee suffered the amputation of the right pinky fingertip while trying to secure an access panel that guards a rotating auger.

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)

(6) Workplace labeling. Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with either:

29 CFR 1910.147 · Lockout/tagout

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)

(6) Periodic inspection. (i) The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.219 · Belts, pulleys and power-transmission parts

29 CFR 1910.272 · Grain handling facilities

Other other animal food manufacturing employers in South Dakota

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.