OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Pedro Gutierrez: OSHA inspections and violations

Waxahachie, Texas · Masonry Contractors · NAICS 238140

3inspections
4citation items
$6,107current penalties
Oct 23, 2026last inspection

Pedro Gutierrez has 3 OSHA inspections on record in Texas, the first in 2017.

OSHA's last visit started on Oct 23, 2026 to follow up on an earlier case, in Waxahachie.

Across those inspections OSHA issued 4 citation items: 4 serious.

OSHA proposed $7,416 in penalties. After settlements and reviews the total is $6,107, down 18%.

Most often, OSHA cited 1926.1153, silica dust in construction (2 items).

For context, across all construction employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,080. Pedro Gutierrez averages $3,054 over 2 cited inspections in that time.

Pedro Gutierrez: OSHA citation items per year, 2017 to 2026
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Want to know if OSHA cites Pedro Gutierrez again? Add it to a watchlist and we will email you the morning the citation shows up.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 349244061 OPENED OCT 23, 2026Closed

Follow-up · Partial · Health · 2 employees at the site · Closed Oct 29, 2026

261 Rosemallow, Waxahachie, TX 75165 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 348456633 OPENED AUG 21, 2025Open

Planned · Partial · Health · 2 employees at the site · Open

261 Rosemallow, Waxahachie, TX 75165 · Masonry Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) · Respiratory protection
Serious$3,405$3,405Jan 29, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1) · Silica dust in construction
Serious$1,702$1,702Jan 29, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) · Silica dust in construction
Serious$0$0Jan 29, 2026Final

Inspection 342800281 OPENED NOV 29, 2017Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 4 employees at the site · Closed Jan 5, 2018

2500 Washington Ave, Fort Worth, TX 76114 · Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v) · Aerial lifts
Serious$2,309$1,000Dec 5, 2017Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.134 · Respiratory protection

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)

(1) The test instrument must have an effective audio-warning device, or a visual-warning device in the form of a screen tracing, that indicates when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test must be terminated and restarted from the beginning when the test subject fails to hold his or her breath during the test. The test subject then may be refitted and retested.

29 CFR 1926.1153 · Silica dust in construction

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1)

(c) Specified exposure control methods. (1) For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i)

(2) Exposure assessment—(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.

29 CFR 1926.453 · Aerial lifts

Other masonry contractors employers in Texas

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.