OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Pine River Pre-Pack, Inc.: OSHA inspections and violations

Newton, Wisconsin · Cheese Manufacturing · NAICS 311513

2inspections
6citation items
$2,856current penalties
Feb 21, 2019last inspection

OSHA has inspected Pine River Pre-Pack, Inc. 2 times in Wisconsin since 2015.

The latest one began on Feb 21, 2019 as a planned inspection, in Newton.

Those inspections ended with 6 citation items: 6 serious.

Penalties were first proposed at $4,080 and now stand at $2,856, 30% lower after settlements or reviews.

How that compares: the median penalty per cited inspection for manufacturing employers since 2015 is $4,873, and Pine River Pre-Pack, Inc. averages $2,856 (1 cited inspection).

Pine River Pre-Pack, Inc. also files yearly injury logs with OSHA, summarized below.

Pine River Pre-Pack, Inc.: OSHA citation items per year, 2015 to 2019
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

Wisconsin · latest 90 days of OSHA records

232employers cited

2 of them in the same industry

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in Wisconsin: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in Wisconsin

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Pine River Pre-Pack, Inc. and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 343797320 OPENED FEB 21, 2019Closed

Planned · No inspection · Safety · 26 employees at the site · Closed Feb 21, 2019

10134 Pine River Road, Newton, WI 53063 · Cheese Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

No citations from this inspection.

Inspection 340219955 OPENED JAN 30, 2015Closed

Planned · Partial · Safety · 20 employees at the site · Closed May 1, 2015

10134 Pine River Road, Newton, WI 53063 · Cheese Manufacturing · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1) · Lockout/tagout
Serious$1,020$714Mar 3, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii) · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks
Serious$0$0Mar 3, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) · Machine guarding
Serious$1,700$1,190Mar 3, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.219(i)(2) · Belts, pulleys and power-transmission parts
Serious$0$0Mar 3, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 3a
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2) · Electrical equipment, general requirements
Serious$1,360$952Mar 3, 2015Final
Citation 1, item 3b
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i) · Electrical wiring methods
Serious$0$0Mar 3, 2015Final

Injury and illness logs

From the Form 300A summaries employers file with OSHA each year. Rate = recordable cases per 100 full-time workers.

In 2025, the Newton site logged 6 recordable injuries or illnesses among about 41 workers: 15.0 per 100 full-time workers, against a median of 4.2 for its industry. Those cases cost 49 days away from work.

Site and yearWorkersCasesDays-away casesRateIndustry median
Pine River Pre-Pack, Inc
Newton · 2025
41 6315.04.2

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.147 · Lockout/tagout

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1)

(c) General—(1) Energy control program. The employer shall establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source, and rendered inoperative.

29 CFR 1910.178 · Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii)

(iii) An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years.

29 CFR 1910.212 · Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

(a) Machine guarding—(1) Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.

29 CFR 1910.219 · Belts, pulleys and power-transmission parts

29 CFR 1910.303 · Electrical equipment, general requirements

29 CFR 1910.305 · Electrical wiring methods

Other cheese manufacturing employers in Wisconsin

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in Wisconsin the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.