OSHA SearchOSHA records by employer

Pinebrook and Son LLC: OSHA inspections and violations

Great Falls, South Carolina · Steel Foundries (except Investment) · NAICS 331513

1inspections
6citation items
$750current penalties
Apr 2, 2026last inspection

Pinebrook and Son LLC has one OSHA inspection on record in South Carolina.

OSHA opened it on Apr 2, 2026 as a planned inspection, in Great Falls, and the case has not closed yet.

From that inspection OSHA issued 6 citation items: 6 serious.

OSHA proposed $750 in penalties and the amount has not been reduced.

Most often, OSHA cited 1910.1200, hazard communication (3 items).

For context, across all manufacturing employers the median penalty per cited inspection since 2015 is $3,600. Pinebrook and Son LLC averages $750 over 1 cited inspection in that time.

Pinebrook and Son LLC: OSHA citation items per year, 2026 to 2026
Citation items per year, by inspection date.

South Carolina · latest 90 days of OSHA records

43employers cited

Get notified the morning OSHA posts each new citation in South Carolina: the employer, the site address, the rules broken and the penalty.

See who gets cited next

Latest cited in South Carolina

Checking a subcontractor, a client or your own company? Watch Pinebrook and Son LLC and get notified the morning OSHA posts a new citation for it.

Watch this company

Inspection history

Inspection 348862137 OPENED APR 2, 2026Open

Planned · Complete · Health · 7 employees at the site · Open

1449 Catawba River Rd, Great Falls, SC 29055 · Steel Foundries (except Investment) · OSHA's record · Phone and website on Google Maps

Citation and ruleTypeProposedCurrentIssuedStatus
Citation 1, item 1a
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(3)(i) · Silica dust in general industry
Serious$525$525Sep 24, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 1b
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i) · Silica dust in general industry
Serious$0$0Sep 24, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 1c
29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(1)(i) · Silica dust in general industry
Serious$0$0Sep 24, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2a
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$225$225Sep 24, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2b
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0Sep 24, 2026Final
Citation 1, item 2c
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) · Hazard communication
Serious$0$0Sep 24, 2026Final

The rules behind these citations

Current text from the Code of Federal Regulations. Some citations were issued under older wording.

29 CFR 1910.1053 · Silica dust in general industry

29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(3)(i)

(3) Scheduled monitoring option. (i) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of one or more personal breathing zone air samples that reflect the exposures of employees on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where several employees perform the same tasks on the same shift and in the same work area, the employer may sample a representative fraction of these employees in order to meet this requirement. In representative sampling, the employer shall sample the employee(s) who are expected to have the highest exposure to respirable crystalline silica.

29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i)

(2) Written exposure control plan. (i) The employer shall establish and implement a written exposure control plan that contains at least the following elements:

29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(1)(i)

(i) Medical surveillance—(1) General. (i) The employer shall make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who will be occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year.

29 CFR 1910.1200 · Hazard communication

Other steel foundries (except investment) employers in South Carolina

Alert subscribers get notified of each newly cited employer in South Carolina the morning it is posted. See the alert plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement data. A citation is OSHA's allegation; employers can contest it, and the status column shows where each item stands. Something wrong on this page? Tell us.